Saturday, March 2, 2013

Google Glass: Humanity's Privacy Invasion

As my college instructor, Eric Young, reviewed Google Glass in class, my hands started to sweat.  The all so recognizable feeling of euphoria that's pulses over my body began to surge as I see the magic that is the "next big thing."  Wow, with Glass I can relive life's experiences through my prospective.  Share with others what I see, from my point of view as I remembered it.  Not from some third party perspective or having a hand held device come between me and the experience.

The one thing that technology has never been able to duplicate is the "holy grail" of what makes us human.  Face-to-face connected communication.  Eye contact.  One soul staring into the eyes of another creating human connection.  Although we repeatedly watch conversation in television and in movies, having the actors look directly into the camera is disturbing and only used for dramatic effect.  In the news, although the reporters look at the camera, they do not address us personally or follow our movements.  Plus it is obvious they are reading from a teleprompter.  I would consider video messaging a more intimate way of communicating, although due to the lenses location, away from the screen, the person in cyberspace is not really looking at you.  Even if they were to look right at the camera, they are looking at an inanimate object, void of the energy that is created by interpersonal connection.

With all the technology of the day, when people are in public, there is no longer an expectation of privacy.  Cameras capture our actions in multipal locations throughout our day.  Banks, parking lots, traffic cams, security systems, ATM's, retailers, and the 8-year-old with an iPod, all monitor our actions without us giving it a second thought.  My image and likeness is not me.  Even as I see myself on video, that guy is not who I see in the mirror.  The guy in the mirror looks into me.  He is the same person who looks into others, connecting on a human level.

Legally what we say, and what we publish in print, are two different things.  No single one-on-one communication is ever used to convict someone of a crime.  This would be considered hearsay, or "your word against mine."  It is easily dismissed as "I was only joking" or that was opinion or taken out of context.  In this way interpersonal communication is sacred.  Although the words we say in a dyad may be repeated, the communication and connection of the exchange is unique to the moment and are private.   

I see Glass as more than recording pictures and getting directions.  I see enormous point of view (POV) applications in video games, advertisements, reality entertainment and even porn.  But I see darker applications.  Criminals documenting robberies, murder and rape.  Children and teens watching unfiltered content with no way of parental monitoring.  However I feel the most pressing issue is privacy.

People act differently when being put in front of a camera, and the first thing that leaves is human connection.  Already we are seeing a loss in human interaction as a whole.  Texting is replacing conversation, FaceBook and other social media sites replacing truly being social, and hours of each day being spent with mindless media.  Yet adding something that could inhibit interpersonal communication due to the fear of being monitored could hinder connection even further.  The one thing that makes us human.

I imagine as Google Glass type products become mainstream, we will have no choice but to assume we are always on camera, even in private conversation.  How will this effect human behavior?  Will we have to monitor everything we say and do in interpersonal connection?

As we lovingly stop to enjoy a moment of connection and stare into each others eyes.... is someone else watching?  Google Glass could be the greatest privacy invasion of humanity, and we may not even care, because it is the next big thing.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Gun Control and FaceBook

The demographic of my social media family seem to all fall into one of three categories   The first two, the polar opposites of each other, seem to take the extreme view on any debatable issue. These are the "Friends" that are vying for my attention by making outrageous accusations, sensationalizing news, and posting animated images of everything going to hell in a handbasket in our country.  Calls to action on everything are unceasing.

The chasm between these identifiable groups is widening.  Paranoia is intensifying. Groupthink is creeping into these socially isolated cells of like-minded extremists, as they begin to believe their own rhetoric.  The things they say I should be doing seem so urgent and important.  If I'm from St. George I've been sheltered from the real world and should not be so narrow-minded.  If I support the constitution, I should buy automatic weapons.  If I'm not racist, I should accept any behavior.  If I love children, I should destroy all guns. I should tax the rich. I should feed the poor.  Balance the budget. Fight for freedom...  I had no idea all these things were up to me RIGHT NOW.  It's amazing that the sun even comes up in the morning.  Apparently if you read something on Facebook enough, it must be true, and if it's true, I must share it?

The gun control issue seems to be the most divisive issue in social media.  If it were true that the president is trying to take away our rights, or that gun control is not about guns, its about control, I'd actually be freaked out like so many of the other sheep.  Conversely, others imply that if we had no guns there would be no more public killings, and anyone that thinks we need automatic weapons is an uneducated redneck.  My "Friends" are passing around made-up statistics on FaceBook like a game of telephone gossip played by school kids.  The more they get passed around the more outlandish the statistics.


323 murders by guns in 2011.  Ya, maybe in Chicago.


It seems to comes down to two statements.  Either...

Shame on me for not protecting children.
or
Shame on me for not defending the constitution.

The third group in my social mediated world is the one I fall into.  The social voyeur.  The cooler head that observes this chaos but stays away from the trap of picking a side and then being forced by my friends to defend it.

I sit and shake my head at all of people that are trying to become heroic alarmists.  My worry is not that my second amendment rights will be taken away, or worrying about my children's daily safety.  I worry about the divisiveness of our community.  Are we not all in this together? 


The reality is there are crazies out there.  We must do whatever we can to identify and assist these people to receive the counseling and guidance they need to be safe citizens. However, by dividing the country and enhancing conspiracy theories, we may just be creating more paranoia and isolationism among people that may be ready to snap. Those who may go into a school to make a cowardly statement.






Friday, January 11, 2013

Tony Beatty's Comm 4330 Blog
New Media Applications



I remember the feeling of uphoria I recieved when I opened my new iPhone on the day it was first released.  My adrenalin raced as I saw my dream of the untimate digital tool comingto florition in my hand.  In that moment I was the man.  I felt like I was somehow in partnership with Apple and that they were using my thoughts and ideas as their platform for research and development of a product that should have included my name.  The new medium of communication.  
Soon I was alianaing my friends and family.  I was spending so much time planing my effective life on my new effective tool that my personal productivity ceased.  I was becoming an productivity junkie.
New media enable us to communicate but.....  it replaces face-to-face time with others and impedes having real connection.  Children develop in the context of a relationship. Emotions drive behavior when people are together they feel the emotions created through their connection. These emotions are central in all relationships and give feedback toward a heightened self and social awareness, promoting thinking, reflecting and an understanding of what is going on within and between us. These are essential skills all lacking in digital communication.  It appears that the more elaborate our means of communication, the less we actually communicate.